Price of admission
Last week Steve Jobs presented a new version of the Apple TV device and announced that it would stream only rented content and that TV episodes would be available at a lower price point of $0.99. With these changes Apple addressed weak points in its video strategy, which had caused lackluster sales. However, while consumers may be pleased it seems that the lower price ponit is a point of contention with the television networks. So far only ABC and FOX have signed on to Apple TV, and many speculate that ABC did so since since Steve Jobs is on the board of directors for Disney while in FOX got the OK since Rupert Murdoch is interested in working with Apple on iPad projects that support Newscorp’s publishing business.
Ignoring political alliances, I wondered just what the floor price should be for an Apple TV rental. The blog TVByTheNumbers had a provocative post, hyposthesizing that on average broadcast networks make $0.80 in advertising per viewer during a one-hour broadcast show.
CPM of $25 = $0.03 per view x 32 spots = $0.80 per viewer per episode
I considered this $0.80 should be the benchmark by which a substitution view should be judged. I then set out to estimate the revnues other platforms created on a per viewer basis and compare. The revenue models accounted for the following factors:
- Revenue stream (advertising or user payment)
- Advertisements per episode stream (applicable only to Broadcast TV, Hulu and Hulus Plus)
- Viewers per episode stream (dependent upon the delivery screen)
- Viewings (greater than 1 if the episode has been purchased)
I decided to ignore advertising commissions and distribution fees, which could be a major factor for networks to estimate the benefit, or lack thereof, in distributing their shows via iTunes and Apple TV. At the end of this post are all the calculations for each of the platforms. The following graph summarizes the results:
Even with the higher CPM prices (cited in the Appendix) it seems that Hulu offers the lowest revenue per user. However, Hulu Plus’ dual revenue stream (similar to cable TV), which accounts for a $9.99 monthly fee as well as advertising, jumps the gap and manages to post the highest revenue per user, clearly the winning model. The per-episode purchase models of Amazon and iTunes also pose a decent revenue of $0.66 per viewer while Apple TV’s rental model comes in at a lower $0.50 per customer, which might be too low for certain networks.
As I mentioned before this price doesn’t reflect any distribution fees that Apple might take so the comparison for iTunes and Apple TV might not be accurate. I might also be ignoring other factors. For example, episode purchases through Amazon might have more viewers per episode than Apple iTunes since the Amazon service has more streaming options to televisions.
Another thing to consider is that although broadcast television may take in around an average of $0.80 per viewer during every hour of primetime, these viewers are also likely to continue watching the same channel, contributing to further revenue on the channel during the next show. They are also going to be exposed to TV spots promoting the network’s other content. These are benefits that would might be incurred towards a limited extent with Hulu (which does promote a network and its other content), but would be completely absent with Amazon and Apple. Therefore, there is a much larger set of intangible benefits to a viewer watching a show on a network, that can’t be simply accounted for in the subscriber, rental or advertising revenue of alternate platforms.
I want to also highlight that DVDs are sold after a television show ends, so this aggregate revenue stream doesn’t directly compete with a broadcast audience like Hulu, Amazon or Apple’s services, so it has a different set objectives of to fulfill; not so much to compensate for an audience which is not watching the show on television as helping pay for the production costs- typically a broadcast production only covers 50% to 75% of its costs through broadcast distribution; the rest has to be recouped through syndication and other sources like DVD sales.
Even though I do think these models are inherently limited in their ability to compare the platforms, I still believe the comparison illustrates well some of the factors that are involved in the pricing and negotiation of these deals, and indicate why the new Apple TV rental model is not currently accepted by CBS, NBC and other networks.
Appendix
For Hulu, I calculated the advertising based on a CPM of $63 since according to Wired their rates run about two to three times that of broadcast television. This sounds a bit high to me but it’s possible since the Hulu has better targeting, higher valued demos, and lower commercial skipping/avoidance than broadcast TV.
Hulu: CPM of $63 x 6 spots = $0.38 per viewer per episode
In the case of Hulu Plus I added the $9.99 monthly fee, divided by 18.8 episodes per month (this was estimated by taking the average monthly minutes per Hulu viewer by 47, 44 minutes of content plus six 15-second spots).
Hulu Plus: $9.99 monthly fee / 18.8 episodes = $0.53 in fees per episode + $0.38 in ad revenues = $0.91 per viewer per episode
Since Amazon, iTunes and Apple TV are strictly purchased or rented models, advertising was not part of equation. For Apple TV I assumed that an average of two viewers would watch each rented episode since it streamed to a television. In the case of Amazon and iTunes I assumed an average of only 1.5 viewers since their models could stream to computers that inhibited group viewing. I also assumed that content purchased via Amazon and iTuens would be viewed more than once.
Amazon: $1.99 purchase fee / 1.5 viewers / 2 viewings = $0.66 per viewer per episode
iTunes: $1.99 purchase fee / 1.5 viewers / 2 viewings = $0.66 per viewer per episode
Apple TV: $1.99 purchase fee / 2 viewers / 1 viewing = $0.50 per viewer per episode
The model for DVDs was similar to iTunes and Amazon, only substituting a $2.50 price per episode based on the retail price of $60 for a DVD set with 24 episodes.
DVD: $2.50 purchase fee / 2.0 viewers / 2 viewings = $0.63 per viewer per episode



[...] brilliant blog “Between the Screens” published a fascinating post about the revenues generated from the various platforms. Price of [...]
Interesting article but some elements I do not understand:
- In the Broadcast calculation, you implcitely assume only one person is viewing the content (although it is on the TV where AppleTV and DVD have 2…just because it is on TV!)
- not sure the content owners get a share of the 9.99$/month subscription for Hulu Plus (unless they are shreholders)
- why do we absolutely want to oppose broadcast to other types of viewing? Comparing the broadcast first veiw to the theatrical release, the rest of the options would probably be a lot lower if there was not a first broadcast to reach a wide audience.
Thanks for the comments. I admit that the viewer estimation per platform is imperfect but I have very little data to go on. Regarding the revenue sharing, i am not certain either how this is set, but keep in mind that NBC, Fox and ABC are shareholders of Hulu. Lastly, I personally don’t oppose other options of viewing besides broadcast. I just think that any alternative has to justify its business model. Jason Kilar, CEO of Hulu, recently posted an interesting and provocative blog post comparing Hulu’s revenues per episode to broadcast.
http://blog.hulu.com/2011/02/02/stewart-colbert-and-hulus-thoughts-about-the-future-of-tv/